New Study: Temp Adjustments Account For 'Nearly All Warming'

[Chicks]

Dr. Craig Idso: Heartland Institute
Dr. James P. Wallace III ... B.S., Aeronautical Engineering, Brown University: Does anyone see anything remotely qualifying him to study climate science?

Don't have time to look up all of these, but I'm pretty sure they are all associated with Big Coal, Big Oil, etc. See my link above, a list of all these orgs that post fraudulent "scientific" studies.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

See my link above, a list of all these orgs that post fraudulent "scientific" studies.

The lefty UCS link? UCS thinks that scientific studies that don't agree with their agenda is "fraudulent"? Sounds about right.

https://www.activistfacts.com/organi...ed-scientists/

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

The lefty UCS link? UCS thinks that scientific studies that don't agree with their agenda is "fraudulent"? Sounds about right.

https://www.activistfacts.com/organi...ed-scientists/

Irony alert. You're essentially saying that one paper that hasn't yet been peer-reviewed renders all other studies and papers and the broad consensus of the scientific community fraudulent.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Irony alert. You're essentially saying that one paper that hasn't yet been peer-reviewed renders all other studies and papers and the broad consensus of the scientific community fraudulent.

If you're going to try to put words in someone's mouth, try to do a better job of it.

This is simply one additional data point that suggests that the concept of man made global warming is built on a house of cards.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

If you're going to try to put words in someone's mouth, try to do a better job of it.

This is simply one additional data point that suggests that the concept of man made global warming is built on a house of cards.

In your effort to refute me, you confirmed exactly what I said.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by finnbow

In your effort to refute me, you confirmed exactly what I said.

And the study quotes in the OP say nothing about man made global warming. What it claims is that the adjusted data overstates the degree of global temperature increase.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

In your effort to refute me, you confirmed exactly what I said.

Uh, no. But if it makes you feel better to believe that, you go boy.

[finnbow]

A real study was just released that disproves Whell's fantasy:

How much Earth will warm in response to future greenhouse gas emissions may be one of the most fundamental questions in climate science — but it’s also one of the most difficult to answer. And it’s growing more controversial: In recent years, some scientists have suggested that our climate models may actually be predicting too much future warming, and that climate change will be less severe than the projections suggest.

But new research is helping lay these suspicions to rest. A study, out Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, joins a growing body of literature that suggests the models are on track after all. And while that may be worrisome for the planet, it’s good news for the scientists working to understand its future.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...imate-science/