Violence?

[donquixote99]

How do you expect a serious answer to such a loaded question?

1. Not admitting the Clintons are awful, but leave then out of it in any case--old news.
2. Do you have actual evidence of actual wrongdoing by the Bidens? I think not.
3. Even if the Bidens were dirty, it doesn't make Trump right to ignore the law going after them. You're basically engaging in a whataboutery defense.

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

How do you expect a serious answer to such a loaded question?

1. Not admitting the Clintons are awful, but leave then out of it in any case--old news.
2. Do you have actual evidence of actual wrongdoing by the Bidens? I think not.
3. Even if the Bidens were dirty, it doesn't make Trump right to ignore the law going after them. You're basically engaging in a whataboutery defense.

1) The only Clinton that can be left out is Chelsea. Wikileaks showed her as being very distraught about even the hint or appearance of impropriety.

2)Obviously I have no evidence. However it is also obvious that Biden is very unconcerned with appearance with his son in tow. It indicates a serious lack of class.

3) My input, post #10, was not in defense of Trump, but in reaction to feasible and the glare on Biden which is good since it increases the chance of Warren.

Democrats should not repeat the same mistake they made with the Hillary candidacy.