Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2022, 05:20 PM
Mark B Mark B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Minnesota Iron Range
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
Most? Even that article said 60/40 with a ton of caveats.

"The bottom line is both Democrats and Republicans are responsible for growth of the national debt."

A politician never met a dollar he didn't like.

Reminds me of Who's Line Is It Anyway - 'the rules are made up and the debt doesn't matter'

Until it does!
You really need the definition of most?

OK:

"Most" - greatest in amount, quantity, or degree.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-19-2022, 05:34 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
Fair enough.
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-19-2022, 07:28 PM
mpholland's Avatar
mpholland mpholland is offline
reflexionar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 2,273
The problem being when "speaking" in a political forum, terms such as most or least are usually thought of in extremist terms so most could be understood to be above 90% and least under 10%. Such as propagating the idea that most republicans are far right misogynistic racists or most democrats are far left liberal communists. That could lead to the idea that most of the country is extremely politically divided, which I disagree with. I think that most of the population is currently unaffiliated and most of the country is also pretty apathetic when it comes to politics...hence the usual dismal voter turnout. All this hooplah from both sides about voter fraud and voter suppression when the reality is "most" simply don't seem to give a shit.
__________________
“Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.” Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-20-2022, 02:48 AM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpholland View Post
. I think that most of the population is currently unaffiliated and most of the country is also pretty apathetic when it comes to politics...hence the usual dismal voter turnout. All this hooplah from both sides about voter fraud and voter suppression when the reality is "most" simply don't seem to give a shit.
Most just busy trying to secure shelter and put food on the table.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-19-2022, 07:33 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,175
Calling 60% 'most' is pretty small beer, as political exaggeration goes. It's not even a lie.

All the exaggeration and lying is a vicious circle. You exaggerate to try to get people's attention, and they tune you out because you exaggerate. So some go for the big whoppers to try to either get some attention, or brainwash the brainwashable.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-22-2022, 07:26 PM
barbara's Avatar
barbara barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,172
Quote:
Dondilion
The major issue now is inflation. Has it peaked?

It seems to me inflation is another name for corporate greed.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-22-2022, 11:54 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara View Post
It seems to me inflation is another name for corporate greed.
The Fed's unwillingness to use its tools is a sign of the time. The well-connected have become accustomed to easy money. This guy Powell is a joker; he has been playing. That is why we need a Volcker.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2022, 02:58 AM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara View Post
It seems to me inflation is another name for corporate greed.
Just saw on Youtube the Budget Committee Hearing which was chaired by Senator Sanders.

It revealed the enormous pricing power of very profitable corporations. Such a state of affair is made easy by the lack of competition due to the ever increasing monopolistic, olegarchic character of the US economy.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-12-2022, 10:06 AM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
Chairman Powell left .75 in his toolbox, but .5 is not gonna work. Inflation is entrenched.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-25-2022, 10:56 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
Or maybe a Perot, complete with charts and a pointer.
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.