Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke
I'd have to dig it up but McCulloch recently reported that there was all sorts of testimony -- from both camps -- he found personally less than credible but that ALL statements were turned over to the Grand Jury.
Sum? He filtered nothing.
That the reasonable people of a Grand Jury found one side more truthful than the other is just what occurred.
|
It's in the article you accused me of not reading.
He never said whether it was from both camps and, of course, it's just him saying this and in a radio interview, not under oath.
As for "filtering", it's prosecutorial malpractice to sit there and allow a witness to commit perjury without challenge or cross-examination.
John