Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 08-18-2017, 09:02 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Spencer advocates for an Aryan homeland for the supposedly dispossessed white race and calls for “peaceful ethnic cleansing” to halt the “deconstruction” of European culture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_B._Spencer

You should be informed enough to know this. Your comment again shows your deliberate obtuseness.
I wasn't aware of this and there's no valid reason why I should've been informed enough to know. Now I do.

My comment wasn't in the least bit obtuse. As I just stated I wasn't aware of these statements or similar statements. But thanks for the info and your superciliousness anyway.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."

Last edited by nailer; 08-18-2017 at 09:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-18-2017, 09:05 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
This is making me late for work. I'm glad I'm my own boss.

There are issues on which there is a near consensus - although the consensus shifts from time to time. There appears to be a broad consensus that nazism and advocacy of white supremacy are morally repugnant. Members of many many groups - including it seems, captains of industry - appear to agree with that proposition.
As do I.

Now get to work defending the sovereign citizen from our Capitalist Pig Robber Baron overlords. American Fascism in other words.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."

Last edited by nailer; 08-18-2017 at 09:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-18-2017, 09:54 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer View Post
I wasn't aware of this and there's no valid reason why I should've been informed enough to know. Now I do.

My comment wasn't in the least bit obtuse. As I just stated I wasn't aware of these statements or similar statements. But thanks for the info and your superciliousness anyway.
Stick around. I'll learn you something.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-18-2017, 10:02 AM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,057
"Free speech" can be practically limited by intent provocation or encitement. Provocation and encitement may also be used as implicit goals for advocating " free speech", by authorisation.
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.