PDA

View Full Version : Clinton (CAP) Donors- Walmart, Citigroup, Big Phama, Big Healthcare


whell
01-21-2015, 06:58 PM
Perhaps most notably, given CAP’s advocacy for an economically progressive agenda, is that CAP’s top donors include Walmart and Citigroup, each of which have given between $100,000 and $499,000. Other donors to CAP — a leading advocate of health care reform — include the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, which represents leading biotech and bio-pharma firms, and Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, both of which have given up to $49,000.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/01/21/center-for-american-progress-poised-to-wield-influence-over-2016-reveals-its-top-donors/?postshare=6471421863975686

CAP has already exercised considerable influence over the Democratic policy machinery in Washington, and the group’s influence could very well grow, particularly if Clinton is elected president. So more scrutiny of the organization is probably inevitable. But even if it is increasing its own transparency, the broader problem will remain.

finnbow
01-21-2015, 07:32 PM
I guess they want to develop a relationship with the next President. Nothing new there. It's funny to see Walmart snuggle up to a Democrat though, given their posture on the minimum wage.

bobabode
01-21-2015, 07:58 PM
Perhaps most notably, given CAP’s advocacy for an economically progressive agenda, is that CAP’s top donors include Walmart and Citigroup, each of which have given between $100,000 and $499,000. Other donors to CAP — a leading advocate of health care reform — include the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, which represents leading biotech and bio-pharma firms, and Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, both of which have given up to $49,000.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/01/21/center-for-american-progress-poised-to-wield-influence-over-2016-reveals-its-top-donors/?postshare=6471421863975686

CAP has already exercised considerable influence over the Democratic policy machinery in Washington, and the group’s influence could very well grow, particularly if Clinton is elected president. So more scrutiny of the organization is probably inevitable. But even if it is increasing its own transparency, the broader problem will remain.


Chickenfeed in the realm of campaign contributions.

Would you agree that we should go back to the original 501 c4 laws as written?

whell
01-21-2015, 08:44 PM
Would you agree that we should go back to the original 501 c4 laws as written?

Hell no. I've posted here many times before that all of that crap needs to be scrapped and campaign / PAC contributions should be taxable. For these organizations to get the same tax treatment as legit charitable organizations is an abomination IMHO.